|
|
Are you sure you want to report the following content as a violation?
|
|
|
|
The judge tells us during "voir dire" (the questioning of perspective jurors) that if we don't think we can judge a fellow human being, then we should be honest and say so. Nothing wrong with it, just let the judge know. But no one on my Kern County Superior Court panel of 12 jurors raised a hand during this questioning, so I had no reason to believe that there was a mole among us.
It did, however, become scandalously obvious when during deliberations, this person refused to see ANY evidence as acceptable and would see no theory as reasonable. From what this juror said, it is my opinion that had the defendants surprised us all by standing in the courtroom and admitting to the crimes, this juror would still harbor doubt.
This juror made it clear from the start of deliberations that nothing would change this juror's decision, which clearly indicated that this juror was already biased from the beginning --- in other words, choosing willingly to leave common sense at...
|
|
|
|
Please check the following violations, and include anything else in the comment box. |
|
|
| Comment |
|
|
| Email |
|
|
| Captcha |
|
To protect users from spam, please enter the text from the image above.
|
|
|
